move this discussion back to mailing list. On 06/05/2013 05:56 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>>> And are your ok with below representation for common id's parts ? >>>> + .name = "W25Q80BL/W25Q80BV", >>>> + .name = "W25Q16CL/W25Q16DV", >>>> + .name = "W25Q32BV/W25Q32FV_SPI", >>>> + .name = "W25Q64CV/W25Q64FV_SPI", >>>> + .name = "W25Q128BV/W25Q128FV_SPI", >>>> + .name = "W25Q32DW/W25Q32FV_QPI", >>>> + .name = "W25Q64DW/W25Q64FV_QPI", >>>> + .name = "W25Q128FW/W25Q128FV_QPI", >>> >>> Any comments on above representation of part names, as the id's to >>> these pairs are common. >>> This will enhance u-boot sf to support all parts from winbond, but >>> seems like different view of names. >>> >> >> what's the difference between that parts? > > parts were diff in terms of voltages and sone SPI and QPI configurations. > but from the manufacture defeat, pair of parts were same ID's
ok. >> Does software care if it is W25G80BL or BV? >> Or software behaviour is the same and there is only difference in voltage >> or so. > > SW is same even if it 1.8 or 3.3 v. > The only reason for giving the pair of names to support all different parts You are supporting them but you are just not list them. >> I don't care about it so much but it is increase u-boot size. > Why does u-boot size increase, is it because of below representation > on name filed > = "W25Q80BL/W25Q80BV" Just because of longer names which go probably to rodata section. It is not a problem for me at all. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
