On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Otavio,
>
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Otavio Salvador
> <ota...@ossystems.com.br> wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com>
>>>
>>> mx6qsabrelite and nitrogen6q boards are hardware compatible, so let's avoid 
>>> the
>>> code duplication and only use the nitrogen6x source code to make board code
>>> maintainance easier.
>>>
>>> Tested booting a mainline device tree kernel on a mx6qsabrelite board.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com>
>>
>> I think this is a huge improvement I am just not sure about the
>> environment preserving for sabrelite. I think most people using
>> sabrelite end using the U-Boot from SPI NOR.
>
> I can't say whether SPI NOR or SD card is the most common medium for
> storing the environment variables for sabrelite, but my main goal here
> was to try to keep compability with existing code.
>
> Currently mx6qsabrelite defines CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC, so I kept the
> same here. This patch introduces no change in functional behaviour.
>
> If we think CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_xxx should be changed, then this is
> something to be handled by a separate patch.

Agreed :-)

Reviewed-by: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br>

--
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to