On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > > On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> In chatting w/Wolfgang on IRC he felt that we should maintain the >>> highlevel picking a board implies ARCH and other settings. >>> >>> However this seems like a lot of boards in one list.. To get a rough >>> order of magnitude MAKEALL is ~880 lines. How can we reduce this to >>> make it a bit more manageable? >> >> I'd arrange them by vendor. The vendor kconfig variable doesn't need >> to be used in code generation. > > Assuming boards/ is grouped by vendor today: > > $ ls -1 board/ | wc -l > 269 > > still seems like a long list.
Everyone will know the vendor of their board. You could alphabetize and break the list into groups. I think there are some entries in board/ that should be combined and moved into vendor subdirs. I believe Kconfig is flexible enough you could have two ways of selecting a board. By arch/cpu or by vendor. > > - k > -- Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
