On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jon Smirl <jonsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: >> >> On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> In chatting w/Wolfgang on IRC he felt that we should maintain the >>>> highlevel picking a board implies ARCH and other settings. >>>> >>>> However this seems like a lot of boards in one list.. To get a rough >>>> order of magnitude MAKEALL is ~880 lines. How can we reduce this to >>>> make it a bit more manageable? >>> >>> I'd arrange them by vendor. The vendor kconfig variable doesn't need >>> to be used in code generation. >> >> Assuming boards/ is grouped by vendor today: >> >> $ ls -1 board/ | wc -l >> 269 >> >> still seems like a long list. > > Everyone will know the vendor of their board. You could alphabetize > and break the list into groups. I think there are some entries in > board/ that should be combined and moved into vendor subdirs.
There are a lot of boards that could be moved into a vendor subdirs. I suspect we have less than 100 vendors. Maybe as few as 60. Don't some of these ads board belong in the freescale dir? jonsm...@terra:/home/apps/u-boot/board$ ls *ads* -d ads5121 adsvix fads mpc8260ads mpc8266ads mpc8540ads mpc8560ads mx1ads mx31ads > > I believe Kconfig is flexible enough you could have two ways of > selecting a board. By arch/cpu or by vendor. > >> >> - k >> > > > > -- > Jon Smirl > jonsm...@gmail.com > -- Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot