On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Eric Nelson <eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com> wrote: > On 11/04/2013 10:28 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: >> >> Hi Tapani, >> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot development >>>> to get >>>> such changes accepted in reasonable time. >>> >>> >>> I do not know what you mean for a reasonable time. Merge window is >>> closed, that is patchsets adding new features will not be merged in the >>> next release 2013.10. The next release should be 2013.01, and there are >>> chances to get them merged. >> >> >> Do you plan to send a new version of the patch that adds support for >> booting a single binary on the mx6q/dl/solo? >> > > BTW, I have updated patches to consolidate the IOMUX registers, and > they include updates to board/freescale/titanium. > > Should I re-base them on top of the patches which move titanium into > board/barco?
It makes sense to base on this patch, for sure. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot