Hi Tom, On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >>>>> + >>>>> + if (header->magic != 0xEE3355AA) { >>>> >>>> Why is the header the same as AM335x? Shouldn't it be something >>>> like 0xEE3344AA or whatever? >>> No, the header is still same. It is 0xEE3355AA. >>> >> >> My question was why ;) >> What's the point of adding the same magic value for a different SoC? >> Unless there's a good reason for doing so i think this needs to be fixed >> in the EEPROM programmer. > > A magic value is sufficiently magical, I don't think we'll get anyone to > change it at this point. >
With almost half a dozen of AM335x board variants floating around this thing is bound to cause problems eventually. The EEPROM format can simply be updated to fix this. If there's a big resistance in doing this then we might as well live with it - but i would at least ask once ;) Regards, Vaibhav _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot