On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 14:45 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Danny, > > In message <52e15bad.1020...@coloradoengineeringinc.com> you wrote: > > > > > Yes - if you add support for 64 bit configurations in general, and > > > for powerpc64 in particular. > > I don't even have a sense for what would be involved here. How > > fundamentally would the U-Boot code need to change? > > It's probably heavy. There is a ton of places where we assume we can > put an address in a "long" data type, etc.
That's not a problem on 64-bit. It's putting a pointer in an "int" that breaks. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
