Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> We can easily ignore such boards of course, but it would be very nice >>> for U-Boot if it could provide easy configurable drivers and could >>> support as many hardwares as possible. >> Currently it seems that all in-tree boards can be accomodated with the >> construct that I suggested. I am not at all sure that we want code >> which is only used by out-of-tree ports. >> >> Post the port and we can rediscuss new code. > > Full ACK here. It makes no sense to spend time and resources on sup- > porting out-of-tree ports on broken hardware.
Ok, that's fine by me. Thanks for your comments, Shinya _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
