Hi Michal,
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 06:56:04 +0200 Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu> wrote: > Hi, > > On 09/11/2014 05:09 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:33:20 +0200 > > Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, we > >> don't > >> have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry of patches > >> flying > >> around without any kind of central point for them. I'd like to get your > >> formal > >> consent for starting this and if you agree, I'd start sending PR to Albert > >> once > >> the repo is in place. > > > > > > > > Me too. I'd like to own u-boot-uniphier to collect Panasonic-SoC-specific > > changes. > > > > That would be faster and would not disturb Albert. > > > > I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this. > I am keeping zynq patches in my microblaze repo and sending pull request to > Albert > (or Tom now) and there is no problem with that. The point is that you collect Zynq-specific patches in your own place by yourself and then send a pull-req to Albert or Tom, right? It does not matter whether it is a separate u-boot-zynq repo or u-boot-microbraze/zynq branch. I have sent the first series to add the core support of Panasonic SoCs and boards (but it is taking much longer than I have expected) and then I am planning to send more features and boards in the next phase. What's the difference between what I want to do for Panasonic SoCs and what you usually do for Zynq SoCs? > Alberts know that and it is working quite well. It is enough to talk to him > and that's it. > In socfpga case I think there are guys from Altera who maintain it. Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
