Hi Michal,
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:24:39 +0200 Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu> wrote: > Hi guys, > > On 09/18/2014 10:02 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Thursday, September 18, 2014 at 09:58:47 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > >> On 09/18/2014 09:27 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>> On Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 07:18:00 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >>>> Hi Michal, > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 06:56:04 +0200 > >>>> > >>>> Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu> wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> On 09/11/2014 05:09 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 01:33:20 +0200 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > >>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I'd be interested in maintaining u-boot-socfpga repository. So far, > >>>>>>> we don't have a repo for this platform and there is a large flurry > >>>>>>> of patches flying around without any kind of central point for them. > >>>>>>> I'd like to get your formal consent for starting this and if you > >>>>>>> agree, I'd start sending PR to Albert once the repo is in place. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Me too. I'd like to own u-boot-uniphier to collect > >>>>>> Panasonic-SoC-specific changes. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> That would be faster and would not disturb Albert. > >>>>> > >>>>> I am not sure if you need to have separate repo to work like this. > >>>>> I am keeping zynq patches in my microblaze repo and sending pull > >>>>> request to Albert (or Tom now) and there is no problem with that. > >>>> > >>>> The point is that you collect Zynq-specific patches in your own place by > >>>> yourself and then send a pull-req to Albert or Tom, right? > >>>> > >>>> It does not matter whether it is a separate u-boot-zynq repo or > >>>> u-boot-microbraze/zynq branch. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I have sent the first series to add the core support of Panasonic SoCs > >>>> and boards (but it is taking much longer than I have expected) > >>>> and then I am planning to send more features and boards in the next > >>>> phase. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> What's the difference between what I want to do for Panasonic SoCs > >>>> and what you usually do for Zynq SoCs? > >>> > >>> [...] > >>> > >>> I fully support that we should have a repo for the panasonic socs, it's > >>> pointless to load Albert by making him apply patches by hand and you have > >>> proven numerous times that you do know what you're doing. I really see no > >>> blocker for doing this. > >> > >> +1 on this if Masahiro wants to have separate repo. > > > > There is no repo for those SoCs at all, so I'd be all for it. > > This is the flow which is IMHO the best. Thanks for your suggestion! > Masahiro will send the RFC patch for MAINTAINERS file to Albert > with adding his fragment for Panasonic SoCs. If Albert ACK but not apply it > that it means that he agrees with that person to be responsible for this part. > Based on that Masahiro asks for repo (if he wants it) and repo will be > created. The patch for MAINTAINERS is already on our patchwork. Is this the one you mentioned? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/386108/ If so, all I have to do now is to just wait until Albert ackes it? Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
