Kim Phillips wrote: > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:50:25 -0700 > Ira Snyder <i...@ovro.caltech.edu> wrote:
... >> >> In practice, this doesn't seem to make a difference on the MPC8349EMDS >> eval board. Both settings work without any errors. For people like me, >> who are copying an existing board port to a similar board, it would be >> nice if it was correct. > > granted. I'm betting the sbc8349 and tqm834x just copied the setting You would be correct (at least for the sbc). > from the MDS code, so those should get 0 too. Board maintainers, > please test: I won't be able to test this on an sbc until later this week, but don't let that stop you from queueing it up; I suspect it will just be a formality. Thanks, Paul. > diff --git a/include/configs/sbc8349.h b/include/configs/sbc8349.h > index d0338f1..edd928d 100644 > --- a/include/configs/sbc8349.h > +++ b/include/configs/sbc8349.h > @@ -519,7 +519,7 @@ > #endif > > /* System IO Config */ > -#define CONFIG_SYS_SICRH SICRH_TSOBI1 > +#define CONFIG_SYS_SICRH 0 > #define CONFIG_SYS_SICRL SICRL_LDP_A > > #define CONFIG_SYS_HID0_INIT 0x000000000 > > Thanks, > > Kim _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot