On 17 November 2014 at 20:21, Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> From: Adnan Ali <adnan....@codethink.co.uk>
>
> Add S25FL064A and S25FL116K flash indentifiers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adnan Ali <adnan....@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
> index 61545ca..462e5c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = {
> {"S25FL016A", 0x010214, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0,
> 0},
> {"S25FL032A", 0x010215, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0,
> 0},
> {"S25FL064A", 0x010216, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0,
> 0},
> + {"S25FL064A", 0x010216, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0,
> 0},
What is this, already there the same part - any new?
> + {"S25FL116k", 0x014015, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0,
> 0},
Is this tested! can you rebase master and send the same patches.
> {"S25FL128P_256K", 0x012018, 0x0300, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL,
> WR_QPP},
> {"S25FL128P_64K", 0x012018, 0x0301, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL,
> WR_QPP},
> {"S25FL032P", 0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL,
> WR_QPP},
> --
> 2.1.1
>
thanks!
--
Jagan.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
