On 18/12/14 12:14, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 17 November 2014 at 20:21, Ben Dooks <ben.do...@codethink.co.uk> wrote: >> From: Adnan Ali <adnan....@codethink.co.uk> >> >> Add S25FL064A and S25FL116K flash indentifiers. >> >> Signed-off-by: Adnan Ali <adnan....@codethink.co.uk> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c >> index 61545ca..462e5c2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c >> @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = { >> {"S25FL016A", 0x010214, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0, >> 0}, >> {"S25FL032A", 0x010215, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0, >> 0}, >> {"S25FL064A", 0x010216, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0, >> 0}, >> + {"S25FL064A", 0x010216, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0, >> 0}, > > What is this, already there the same part - any new?
I must have missed this when re-basing off the previous u-boot. >> + {"S25FL116k", 0x014015, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0, >> 0}, > > Is this tested! can you rebase master and send the same patches. Yes, it was one of the devices we looked at and tested on a Marvell 88F6281 based system. >> {"S25FL128P_256K", 0x012018, 0x0300, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL, >> WR_QPP}, >> {"S25FL128P_64K", 0x012018, 0x0301, 64 * 1024, 256, RD_FULL, >> WR_QPP}, >> {"S25FL032P", 0x010215, 0x4d00, 64 * 1024, 64, RD_FULL, >> WR_QPP}, >> -- >> 2.1.1 >> > > thanks! > -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot