On 08:57 Sat 20 Jun     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 20 June 2009 07:30:41 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 07:08 Sat 20 Jun     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Saturday 20 June 2009 06:40:07 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > > > On 06:18 Sat 20 Jun     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > On Saturday 20 June 2009 05:33:26 Jean-Christophe wrote:
> > > > > > This patch moves the libgcc Makefile inclusion from the toplevel
> > > > > > Makefile to the arch_config.mk files. This is in preparation for
> > > > > > the ARM architecture to move away from including libgcc function
> > > > > > and only using self-contained U-Boot functions as done in Linux.
> > > > >
> > > > > why not change the top level Makefile to read:
> > > > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC ?= ...
> > > > >
> > > > > then any board/arch that doesnt want it can simply do:
> > > > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC = # dont want it
> > > >
> > > > because you need to provide the equivalent functions for standalone
> > > > application and api and U-Boot ofcourse
> > >
> > > so move it to config.mk.  this doesnt change the important point: leave
> > > PLATFORM_LIBGCC default in the toplevel common files.  what i proposed
> > > doesnt limit what you want to do with arm in any way.
> >
> > I think it's better to let it at arch level and force any new arch adding
> > to manage it instead provide a default one
> 
> considering most arches want this code, i dont think so.  you're proposing we 
> duplicate the same common code in all arches to support one deviating arch -- 
> arm.  the defaults should reflect the common state while the deviating ones 
> change the behavior as they like.
This is where I disagree other arch as mips and other will also need to move 
away
from the needs to include libgcc to be really toolchain independant

I do think it's really important for U-Boot be able to have full control to
have a functions embedded into.

So stop to have libgcc include by default will really reflect it

Best Regards,
J.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to