> > > > > > > > This is where I disagree other arch as mips and other will also need to > > > > move away from the needs to include libgcc to be really toolchain > > > > independant > > > > > > > > I do think it's really important for U-Boot be able to have full > > > > control to have a functions embedded into. > > > > > > > > So stop to have libgcc include by default will really reflect it > > > > > > so you have two arches (mips/arm) that you dont want to use libgcc. that > > > is still vastly the minority. if we ever do get most ports not using > > > libgcc, then pushing it to the arch configs makes sense. but we havent > > > and we arent even close. > > > > which minoroty? > > the majority use libgcc > > > I just give you example but you will see arm, mips, sh, powerpc etc... > > toolchains problem just because we use the libgcc > > 4 is still the minority, but this is Woflgang's call > > > I've patch in qualification for mips and sh so it will not be so long > > maybe 2 or 3 weeks > > considering my proposed change is much simpler, and would allow for trivial > migration as you converted things, it still makes more sense. it's not the size of the change, it's just I do not agree with it
Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
