On 16:41 Sun 12 Jul , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <20090712125617.ga7...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > On 10:28 Sun 12 Jul , Dirk Behme wrote: > > > With commit 8d2effea23e938631126a7888008a0637e13b389 "mtd: Update > > > MTD infrastructure to support 64bit device size" > > > CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF needs to be defined to get correct output > > > and to remove annoying warning > > > > > > warning: #warning Please define CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF for correct > > > output! > > > > > > Add CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF to all OMAP3 configurations. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.be...@googlemail.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > you mush have all board maintainer ack > > Please do not put things on their head. This is not how the mailing > list works. The good old way in Netiquette is "No News is Good News." > When I post a patch, I don't expect that all the subscribers on the > list that agree with the patch will send an ACK - I expect that those > who see problems with it will raise their voice. > > Same here. > > If none of the board maintatiners sends a NAK after a reasonable time > (3...4 days or so, max 1 week), the we can assume that the patch is > OK and should be applied. you ask us multiple time when we touch a board config we do need the board maintainer ack I've 10's of patch that you have nack because I never receive the board maintainer and they still wait to have board Maintainer ack.
So please give only one rules Best Regards, J. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
