Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090712193430.gb1...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > when increase the u-boot size IMHO we do need to have the board maintainer > ack because we do not known if it will break or not the board
It's not practical to wait for all BM's to ACK such a patch - you could reject it right away as well. > Furehermore here all the boards maintainer are active on the ML so it's make > sense to ask them there ack. Do you really want to see - say - 200 ACK messages here? It's not practical. > But I'd like that we put a rules if the developer that post a patch do his > best to have the board maintainer ack but not succed on it. The decission to > ack it anyway will come to the Custiodians & you at the end. If you have a proposal for rules that will actually work in such cases, please feel free to post them here. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de "You can have my Unix system when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers." - Cal Keegan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot