On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:46:42PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 5 August 2015 at 13:35, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: > > How about this patch: > > > > diff --git a/board/tqc/tqma6/tqma6.c b/board/tqc/tqma6/tqma6.c > > index 29db838..345930f 100644 > > --- a/board/tqc/tqma6/tqma6.c > > +++ b/board/tqc/tqma6/tqma6.c > > @@ -28,6 +28,13 @@ > > > > #include "tqma6_bb.h" > > > > +#ifndef CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_BUS > > +#define CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_BUS 0 > > +#endif > > +#ifndef CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_CS > > +#define CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_CS 0 > > +#endif > > Why would need this - it's already part of spi_flash.h
I am also wondering about commit f85764cc1f6ab01ffc60dd78de9c4de4cff2b5ce, which defines CONFIG_SPI_FLASH in the WRU4 defconfig file, even though it does not need SPI flash support, just to work around undefined reference errors regarding spi_flash_free, etc. Couldn't those workarounds be avoided by excluding the SPI parts via ifdefs, as I did in my patch today? > > > > > Does this work for you? > > thanks! > -- > Jagan | openedev. Thanks, Clemens _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot