Hi Christophe, On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard <christophe.ric...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > As per my comment on patch 6, i would disagree as well on this one. > It tpm_vendor_specific structure is convenient for ST33ZP24 for example. > > Best Regards > Christophe >
As things stand they are only used in one place. I think we should work out the best uclass API for the TPM and then go with that. [snip] Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot