Hi Christophe,

On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard
<christophe.ric...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> As per my comment on patch 6, i would disagree as well on this one.
> It tpm_vendor_specific structure is convenient for ST33ZP24 for example.
>
> Best Regards
> Christophe
>

As things stand they are only used in one place. I think we should
work out the best uclass API for the TPM and then go with that.

[snip]

Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to