Hi Christophe, On 13 August 2015 at 14:28, Christophe Ricard <christophe.ric...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Christophe, >> >> On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard >> <christophe.ric...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> As per my comment on patch 6, i would disagree as well on this one. >>> It tpm_vendor_specific structure is convenient for ST33ZP24 for example. >>> >>> Best Regards >>> Christophe >>> >> As things stand they are only used in one place. I think we should >> work out the best uclass API for the TPM and then go with that. > > I agree with that. > How do you want to proceed ? Do you agree to integrate the results of our > exchanges for a new round ?
Yes OK, I'll have a crack at this. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
