Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090723202252.ga9...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > Sorry if I have to ask, but I mostly lost track of the discussion. It > > seems you reject these patches just because you dislike the naming of > > some file-local data structures and variables? > not because I do not like it because there are not safe and must be omap3 > specific and not generic for soc specific struct
We don't make any such restrictions in other, similar header files. Adding (artifical) prefixes like omap3_ as you requested just makes it more likely thatthe some declarations and code will be repeated elsewhere, just with a different name. If you have a specific example, where you see existing or even likely name conflicts, then please show it. Otherwise I suggest we just leave the code as is. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Every program has at least one bug and can be shortened by at least one instruction -- from which, by induction, one can deduce that every program can be reduced to one instruction which doesn't work. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot