> -----Original Message-----
> From: york sun
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:21 AM
> To: Mingkai Hu; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Mingkai Hu
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] armv8/ls1043a: Implement workaround for erratum
> A009660
>
> On 01/19/2016 10:44 PM, Mingkai Hu wrote:
> > From: Mingkai Hu <mingkai...@nxp.com>
> >
> > Memory controller performance is not optimal with default internal
> > target queue register value, write required value for optimal DDR
> > performance.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu <mingkai...@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c
> > b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c
> > index 23d6b73..485f5cd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/soc.c
> > @@ -210,6 +210,18 @@ static void erratum_a009929(void) #endif }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * This erratum requires setting a value to eddrtqcr1 to
> > + * optimal the DDR performance.
> > + */
> > +static void erratum_a009660(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009660
> > + u32 *eddrtqcr1 = (void *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SCFG_ADDR + 0x20c;
> > + out_be32(eddrtqcr1, 0x63b20042);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > void fsl_lsch2_early_init_f(void)
> > {
> > struct ccsr_cci400 *cci = (struct ccsr_cci400
> > *)CONFIG_SYS_CCI400_ADDR; @@ -232,6 +244,7 @@ void
> > fsl_lsch2_early_init_f(void)
> >
> > /* Erratum */
> > erratum_a009929();
> > + erratum_a009660();
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> > index 49b113d..66399b2 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h
> > @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@
> > #define GICC_BASE 0x01402000
> >
> > #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009929
> > +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009660
> > #else
> > #error SoC not defined
> > #endif
> >
>
> NACK.
>
> Erratum A009660 is cancelled. The workaround is integrated into A008514.
> Please revise workaround for A008514. Besides, you are using ARMv7 offset
> for ARMv8.
> Please check if this workaround applies to LS2 SoCs. While you are on it,
> please add a comment to LS1 workaround with the word A008514 so we can
> grep it.
>
Hi York,
I discussed with design team and got the erratum in LS1043A CE before preparing
the patch. The value (0x63b20042) is the same one described in A008514 of
LS1021A and the register offset of LS1043A is same with the one used for
LS1021A which is in the SCFG space.
I will double check with the design team about if the erraum number is still
A009660 and keep you in the loop.
For LS2, I got the A008514 in the LS2085A CE, but
1. The value is 63b2_0002 which is different from the value used on ls1043
platform.
2. The address is in DCFG space.
3. I did not get the A008514 in the LS2080A CE (RevD).
So it's better to confirm with design team about the value used and the
consistence between LS2085A and LS2080A.
Thanks,
Mingkai
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
