On 02/25/2016 01:06 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > [..snip..] > [...]
>> "setenv fdtfile dra72-evm.dtb; fi;" \ >> "if test $board_name = beagle_x15; then " \ >> "setenv fdtfile am57xx-beagle-x15.dtb; fi;" \ >> + "if test $board_name = am57xx_evm; then " \ >> + "setenv fdtfile am57xx-beagle-x15.dtb; fi;" \ > > Is it the same dtb file for am57xx_evm as well? or is this intentional > and will be updated later? Yes - it should be the same dtb file for 2 reasons: A) At this point in patch, we dont want to break am57xx-evm - mentioned in diffstat to remind ourselves. B) we are attempting to move all these "cape" like variants into device tree overlays -> in which case the same dtb is reused even for am57xx-evm, and overlay with panel and touchscreen for the "gpevm" panel board. So, in almost with 80% certainty, we might not introduce a am57xx_evm.dtb in upstream - we really dont need to. In fact, upstream kernel and current master u-boot does bootup successfully, and would like to maintain it so (point A). -- Regards, Nishanth Menon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
