Hi Dirk, <snip>
> Third, I don't like the mixing of board and vendor name as directory > names. It seems to me that where you think you know the vendor, you > use the vendor name, and where you seem to not know it, you use the > board name. So, to be consistent, and to overcome vendor name issue > above, I'd like to use the board name everywhere. That is: Jean-Christophe's patches seem to follow the current U-Boot convention - use board/<vendor> when a vendor has multiple boards, and use board/<boardname> when a vendor only has 1 board. I can't speak to the accuracy of how he split boards up, but his idea seems correct. > board/beagle/ > board/omap3evm/ > board/omap1510inn/ > ... > board/omap5912osk/ > ... > board/omap2420h4/ > ... > board/zoom1/ > board/zoom2/ > board/overo/ > board/pandora/ > ... This isn't in line with how U-Boot currently organizes the board/ directory. > To improve this even more, something like this would be nice: > > board/omap3beagle/ > board/omap3evm/ > board/omap1innovator/ > ... > board/omap1osk/ > ... > board/omap2h4/ > ... > board/omap3zoom1/ > board/omap3zoom2/ > board/omap3overo/ > board/omap3pandora/ > ... Neither is this. Jean-Christophe seems to be doing the "right" thing with his patches and I'd ACK them assuming the boards are put in the proper board/<vendor> and board/<boardname> directory. Best, Peter _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot