Dear Dirk Behme, In message <4a9165af.6050...@googlemail.com> you wrote: > > First, as already discussed, I don't like this and feel fine with > board/omap3. So a formal NACK from me, knowing that it most probably > will be overridden by some others ;)
Indeed. It's the current rule how we organize boards, and your personal preferences are here indeed not reason enough to reject these patches. Sorry. > Second, where do you know from that all these boards are from TI? Are > you sure that they are not from SpectrumDigital, Mistral or DigiKey etc? Well, if you have better information, then please fill in the gaps here. > Third, I don't like the mixing of board and vendor name as directory > names. It seems to me that where you think you know the vendor, you > use the vendor name, and where you seem to not know it, you use the > board name. So, to be consistent, and to overcome vendor name issue > above, I'd like to use the board name everywhere. That is: No. The rule is that when we have a vendor with several boars (say, more than 2), then we will create a vendor directory. I understand that here the conditoon "vendor has more than 2 boards" is fulfilled in several cases. Agreed? > To improve this even more, something like this would be nice: You may consider it nice, we don't. So if anything in JC's patch is incorrect, please provide information to correct it. From what I know, the patch looks OK to me (but I have to admit that I don't know either who the actual board vendors are). Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Weekends were made for programming. - Karl Lehenbauer _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
