Hi Stefan, On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: > Hi Bin, > > On 14.03.2016 09:56, Bin Meng wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Stefan, >>> >>> On 11 March 2016 at 10:33, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Simon, Hi Bin, >>>> >>>> could you please let me know, what the status of I2C support for >>>> BayTrail in U-Boot is? Is this driver generic enough to handle >>>> BayTrail / Minnowboard MAX as well (I haven't looked in depth yet)? >>>> Or what needs to be done to get BayTrail supported here? >>> >>> >>> There is a dummy driver but it does not work. It needs to be filled >>> out with an implementation using the datasheet or perhaps looking at >>> coreboot smbus code. >>> >> >> I guess Stefan is not looking for legacy SMBUS support, instead the >> SIO I2C device on device 24 on BayTrail. > > > I need to communicate with some of I2C devices connected to some > of the I2C busses (e.g. bus #1) on this platform. > >> It is currently not >> supported. The IP used on BayTrail is from Synopsis Designware, and >> this I2C IP is also seen on Intel Quark. > > > Is it documented somewhere, that these BayTrail I2C controllers > are Synopsis Designware based / compatible? Could you please point > me to this datasheet?
I don't think it is documented somewhere that the IP comes from Synopsis Designware. I noticed this when I was working on Intel Quark support, that lots of IPs on Intel Quark are from Synopsis (eg: we have the Synopsis Designware ethernet driver working on Intel Quark). > >> It is possible we can reuse >> U-Boot Synopsis I2C driver on Intel platform, with adaptations to PCI. > > > I can definitely look into this. Thanks for letting me know. Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot