On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jagan Teki <jagannadh.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 23 June 2016 at 19:28, Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > During spi transfer, for example:
> > sspi 1:1.0 8 ff
> >
> > the rx_len values will  be:
> > rx_len = 0
> > rx_len = 4294967295
> >
> > This caused a busy looping during xfer, this patch fixes it
> > by adding a check while reading the rx fifo
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar....@racelogic.co.uk>
> > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com>
> > Cc: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <siva...@xilinx.com>
> > Cc: Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/spi/zynq_spi.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/zynq_spi.c b/drivers/spi/zynq_spi.c
> > index 09ae1be..dd3de27 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/zynq_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/zynq_spi.c
> > @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int zynq_spi_xfer(struct udevice *dev,
> > unsigned int bitlen,
> >
> >          /* Read the data from RX FIFO */
> >          status = readl(&regs->isr);
> > -        while (status & ZYNQ_SPI_IXR_RXNEMPTY_MASK) {
> > +        while ((status & ZYNQ_SPI_IXR_RXNEMPTY_MASK) && rx_len) {
>
> Do post-decrement directly on while.
>
Its the matter of taste, I usually prefer minimal changes.
Anyway above in the function tx_len isnt done in while
just keeping it consistent.

Cheers,
--Prabhakar Lad
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to