> What project are you doing currently for the investigation? I did some E3900/APL-I investigation, back a year ago. Built Coreboot with FSP 2.0, and used as payload SeaBIOS.
Did not like the methodology, especially if it comes to YOCTO via U-boot, as payload. Does not sound correctly. Now, I am doing some serious projects with ARM, U-Boot and YOCTO, but x86 stays still a mystery with the SEC + lower part od PEI (in other words FSP) for Embedded/IoT. Stays a mystery for years. For years I am trying to make some viable/meaningful architecture while I worked with x86. Nowadays, a i am in the same shoes as Andy, doing this investigation mostly for myself. But this stays to be main obstacle with U-Boot. With IoTG community, I should say. Well... And I am really now having you on my radar, since the job you'll do is not an easy one. And... Looking forward to read/experience more about your x86 U-Boot bare metal porting. Thank you for an effort, Zoran On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Zoran, > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Zoran Stojsavljevic > <zoran.stojsavlje...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Bin, > > > > You understood me, seems, perfectly. And this is what I am talking about > > here. > > > > The whole story told by Andy (Shevchenko) as RE: to my other thread does > not > > stand, just because of the booting times. > > > > But I need Andy's story (further) to investigate, and have currently no > any > > spare/free time. But I will later. > > > > And, BTW, you addressed me (wrongly). You should address Simon. To be > > politically correct. ;-) > > > > Please avoid top-posting.. > > What project are you doing currently for the investigation? > > Regards, > Bin > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
