Hi Neil, On 27 November 2017 at 01:48, Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> wrote: > On 26/11/2017 12:39, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Neil, >> >> On 25 November 2017 at 02:45, Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> wrote: >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> Le 24/11/2017 23:35, Simon Glass a écrit : >>>> Hi Neil, >>>> >>>> On 22 November 2017 at 06:25, Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Introduce a generic common Ethernet Hardware init function >>>>> common to all Amlogic GX SoCs with support for the >>>>> Internal PHY enable for GXL SoCs. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-meson/eth.h | 15 ++++++++++ >>>>> arch/arm/mach-meson/Makefile | 2 +- >>>>> arch/arm/mach-meson/eth.c | 53 >>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-meson/eth.h >>>>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-meson/eth.c >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-meson/eth.h >>>>> b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-meson/eth.h >>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>> index 0000000..8ea8e10 >>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-meson/eth.h >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ >>>>> +/* >>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2016 BayLibre, SAS >>>>> + * Author: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> >>>>> + * >>>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ >>>>> + */ >>>>> + >>>>> +#ifndef __MESON_ETH_H__ >>>>> +#define __MESON_ETH_H__ >>>>> + >>>>> +#include <phy.h> >>>>> + >>>>> +void meson_gx_eth_init(phy_interface_t mode, bool use_internal_phy); >>>>> + >>>>> +#endif /* __MESON_ETH_H__ */ >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-meson/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-meson/Makefile >>>>> index bf49b8b..b4e8dde 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-meson/Makefile >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-meson/Makefile >>>>> @@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ >>>>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ >>>>> # >>>>> >>>>> -obj-y += board.o sm.o >>>>> +obj-y += board.o sm.o eth.o >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-meson/eth.c b/arch/arm/mach-meson/eth.c >>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>> index 0000000..46ecb5e >>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-meson/eth.c >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ >>>>> +/* >>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2016 BayLibre, SAS >>>>> + * Author: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> >>>>> + * >>>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ >>>>> + */ >>>>> + >>>>> +#include <common.h> >>>>> +#include <dm.h> >>>>> +#include <asm/io.h> >>>>> +#include <asm/arch/gxbb.h> >>>>> +#include <asm/arch/eth.h> >>>>> +#include <phy.h> >>>>> + >>>>> +void meson_gx_eth_init(phy_interface_t mode, bool use_internal_phy) >>>> >>>> Can you add a header file addition for this somewhere, with comments? >>> >>> Do you mean comments in the added arch/arm/include/asm/arch-meson/eth.h in >>> this >>> same patchset ? >> >> Yes that's what I meant. >> >>> >>>> >>>>> +{ >>>>> + switch (mode) { >>>>> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII: >>>>> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID: >>>>> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID: >>>>> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID: >>>>> + /* Set RGMII mode */ >>>>> + setbits_le32(GXBB_ETH_REG_0, GXBB_ETH_REG_0_PHY_INTF | >>>>> + GXBB_ETH_REG_0_TX_PHASE(1) | >>>>> + GXBB_ETH_REG_0_TX_RATIO(4) | >>>>> + GXBB_ETH_REG_0_PHY_CLK_EN | >>>>> + GXBB_ETH_REG_0_CLK_EN); >>>>> + break; >>>>> + >>>>> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII: >>>>> + /* Set RMII mode */ >>>>> + out_le32(GXBB_ETH_REG_0, GXBB_ETH_REG_0_INVERT_RMII_CLK | >>>>> + GXBB_ETH_REG_0_CLK_EN); >>>> >>>> How come this is using out_le32() instead of (for example) writel()? >>> >>> It should be writel(), but since the register size is 32bit, it can be >>> out_le32 >> >> So why do we have out_le32()? What is the difference?
Still unsure about this one. >> >>> >>>> >>>>> + >>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MESON_GXL >>>> >>>> This doesn't seem fully generic if it has this #ifdef in it. Can this >>>> be a parameter? At worst can we use if() instead of #ifdef ? >>> >>> Yeah, I didn't really figured out how to specify the internal PHY. >>> >>> GXL and GXM SoCs have an internal PHY, but yeah GXBB does't. >>> I hesitated to add a different meson_gx_eth_init() signature >>> for these different SoCs, what do you think about that ? >>> >>> The new AXG SoC does not have internal PHY, so it will use the same >>> code as GXBB. >> >> I think this function needs to be told which SoC type it is dealing >> with, as a separate enum parameters. > > It's more complex since the S905D from the same GXL family can also use an > external RGMII interface *and* the internal PHY depending on the board. > > Could a generic flags parameter be better, and add a GXL specific > MESON_GXL_USE_INTERNAL_RMII_PHY to be passed only on GXL platforms ? Yes that sounds good and will get rid of the CONFIG check. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot