On 28.11.2017 10:08, Goldschmidt Simon wrote: > Simon Goldschmidt wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> Simon Glass wrote: >>> I see that, although it is adding to the fpga header so presumably >>> making it harder for someone to move this over. >> >> Yes, I'm not happy with changing the header and even xilinx C file to add >> functionality for altera. However, this is due to the fact that a core file >> still depends >> on an dogs implementation, which I removed. > > This should have meant "on an fpga implementation". No dogs or offences here. > My mobile phone does not know the word "fpga", obviously. > >> >>> Does anyone on cc know the plan fr conversion of FPGA to driver model? >>> It does not look too tricky from a quick look at the header file. >> >> It does not look tricky, indeed. However, we should try to match this to the >> Linux >> implementation regarding what's needed in the device tree. And I just don't >> know >> that part, yet ;-)
I have not a problem to enable others fpgas to use this functionality. And transition should be done for all these drivers when someone has a time to do it. Thanks, Michal _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
