Hi Jagan, On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 19:13 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev > <eugeniy.palt...@synopsys.com> wrote: > > sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs > > from other SST series, so add implementation for sst26wf > > lock/unlock/is_locked functions. > > I've already mentioned about this patch on last version[1], Since it > effected code on spi_flash (core) I would ask him to send the Linux as > well. And waiting for those as well.
We're going to send a similar patch for the Linux kernel as well. But we're discussing U-Boot here so what is a relationship between patches here and there? Please note what Eugeniy answered to your comment [1]- if sst26xxx ICs are used in read-only mode or some earlier stage disabled write lock for entire IC mentioned patch is not required. But in case of default state of those ICs we do need to allow writes to certain regions of the flash ICs. [1] https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2018-March/322630.html -Alexey _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
