On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:10 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev <eugeniy.palt...@synopsys.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 19:58 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Eugeniy Paltsev >> <eugeniy.palt...@synopsys.com> wrote: >> > sst26wf flash series block protection implementation differs >> > from other SST series, so add implementation for sst26wf >> > lock/unlock/is_locked functions. > [snip] >> > >> > +/* sst26wf series block protection implementation differs from other >> > series */ >> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_SST) >> > + if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == SPI_FLASH_CFI_MFR_SST && >> > + (JEDEC_ID(info) >> 8) == 0x26) { >> >> You can directly use JEDEC_ID that may cover id[0], id[1]? or does >> this only for id[0]? > > It is only for "JEDEC Device Type Byte" (byte 1) == 0x26; > "Device ID Byte" (byte 2) can be any. > > But I can write it like > (info->id[1] == 0x26) > instead of > ((JEDEC_ID(info) >> 8) == 0x26)
OK. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot