On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 06:41:56PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 23.08.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Simon Glass:
> > On 23 August 2018 at 07:58, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> OK, now I'm trying to see what we need to do next. Regardless of Alex's
> >> current EFI PR, we have 7e21fbca26d1 ("efi_loader: Rename sections to
> >> allow for implicit data") in master. Looking at the PR, I see that it
> >> does turn on -fdata-sections on x86, and that Bin reviewed/tested it.
> >> So I'm going to push the PR there shortly.
> >>
> >> If, for sandbox you want to backout --gc-sections now (the commit
> >> message does spell out that we need -ffunction/data-sections and what
> >> for) and re-introduce that for the next release please post the patches
> >> and I'll grab the backout one and apply it (or post it then PR it if
> >> you'd rather, that's fine too).
> >
> > I'd like to back out all of the compilel/link flag changes:
> >
> > Here is my patch:
> >
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/954875/
>
> If you go down that path, please align the subject of that commit with
> what it does, e.g., s/Revert/Partially revert/. Otherwise it is terribly
> confusing for users that don't care about sandbox.With a slight subject reword, should I grab this patch now then? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
