> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 12:44:00AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > On 30 August 2018 at 00:00, Manivannan Sadhasivam > > <manivannan.sadhasi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > Hi Ezequiel, > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 03:11:17AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > >> Hi Manivannan, > > >> > > >> On 21 August 2018 at 14:09, Manivannan Sadhasivam > > >> <manivannan.sadhasi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > >> > This patchset adds board support for Vamrs Limited Rock960, > > >> > which is one of the 96Boards Consumer Edition platform based > > >> > on Rockchip RK3399 SoC. > > >> > > > >> > > >> What are the differences between this consumer edition board, > > >> and the enterprise edition (aka Ficus) Vamrs board? > > >> > > > > > > I asked Vamrs about this and they said the difference is very minimal. > > > > > > > In that case, you should try to leverage the Linux ficus.dts: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-ficus.dts > > > > If no differences, using the ficus dts should do. If there are differences, > > we can create a common rock960.dtsi and then enterprise and consumer > > edition dts. > > > > Okay. Here are the differences between Ficus and Rock960 CE: > > 1. Different host enable GPIO for USB (vcc5v0_host) > 2. Different power and reset for PCI-E (vcc3v3_pcie, pcie0) > 3. No Ethernet port on Rock960 (gmac) > > So, I would suggest keeping USB, PCI-E and GMAC related nodes on the board > specific devicetree and rest on the rk3399-rock960.dtsi. What do you think? > > Same applies to Linux also!
Yes, I think a rk3399-rock960.dtsi with the differences in two .dts would be great, and even better a single U-Boot which can detect the board and load the right DT, but I do think it should be a separate config to evb as Mani mentioned. Peter _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
