On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:27:48 +0100 Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Marek, > > On 20.11.18 12:24, Marek Behun wrote: > >> Any updates on this? Please rebase the still missing patches from > >> this series on top of latest mainline. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Stefan > > > > Hi Stefan, > > I am (almost regularly) rebasing new patches on top of mainline in > > this repository https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/turris/mox-u-boot > > I did not sent the patches yet because I don't know if my model of > > kernel devicetree patching will be accepter in kernel. > > That is: I want to push a complete device-tree for Mox with nodes > > for all modules to kernel, but with nodes for different modules > > disabled. The code in u-boot shall then enable the nodes for devices > > which are enumerated in u-boot. I don't yet know if such a > > device-tree will be accepted in kernel though. > > That's a perfect understandable reasoning and makes sense. So its > perhaps best if we remove the pending patches from the patchwork > queue for now. And you will submit fresh patches, once such a > decision has been made. > > Okay? > Hi, I can send patches which won't be affected by this, though, like the one that fixes A3720 watchdog implementation to be kernel compliant. I am going to rebase and send them, ok? Marek > Thanks, > Stefan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
