On 20.11.18 12:40, Marek Behun wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:27:48 +0100
Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote:

Hi Marek,

On 20.11.18 12:24, Marek Behun wrote:
Any updates on this? Please rebase the still missing patches from
this series on top of latest mainline.

Thanks,
Stefan

Hi Stefan,
I am (almost regularly) rebasing new patches on top of mainline in
this repository https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/turris/mox-u-boot
I did not sent the patches yet because I don't know if my model of
kernel devicetree patching will be accepter in kernel.
That is: I want to push a complete device-tree for Mox with nodes
for all modules to kernel, but with nodes for different modules
disabled. The code in u-boot shall then enable the nodes for devices
which are enumerated in u-boot. I don't yet know if such a
device-tree will be accepted in kernel though.

That's a perfect understandable reasoning and makes sense. So its
perhaps best if we remove the pending patches from the patchwork
queue for now. And you will submit fresh patches, once such a
decision has been made.

Okay?


Hi,
I can send patches which won't be affected by this, though, like the
one that fixes A3720 watchdog implementation to be kernel compliant. I
am going to rebase and send them, ok?

Sure, go ahead.

Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to