On Thursday 03 January 2019 11:44 PM, s...@google.com wrote: > On 12/21/18 9:24 AM, Keerthy wrote: >> fix up fdtdec_get_addr_size to use fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent >> so that the address cells and size cells are obtained from the >> parent instead of going by the fixed length. > > This patch makes perfect sense to me. However, I am worried about the > potential existence of code that assumes the current fixed-size logic; > in the past when fixing similar issues like this we've often run into > code that was use "get addr" functions when it should have been using > "get u32" functions and similar, which then broke when we fixed the > implementation to do the right thing. I guess we should still apply the > patch, and fix up any fallout as it appears.
Thanks Simon! > > Applied to u-boot-dm/next, thanks! > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
