On 1/15/2019 6:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Keerthy,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2019 at 21:39, Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com> wrote:
On Thursday 03 January 2019 11:44 PM, s...@google.com wrote:
On 12/21/18 9:24 AM, Keerthy wrote:
fix up fdtdec_get_addr_size to use fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent
so that the address cells and size cells are obtained from the
parent instead of going by the fixed length.
This patch makes perfect sense to me. However, I am worried about the
potential existence of code that assumes the current fixed-size logic;
in the past when fixing similar issues like this we've often run into
code that was use "get addr" functions when it should have been using
"get u32" functions and similar, which then broke when we fixed the
implementation to do the right thing. I guess we should still apply the
patch, and fix up any fallout as it appears.
Thanks Simon!
Unfortunately this breaks the tests (make qcheck). Can you please take a look?
Simon,
Can you paste the logs? I am at u-boot master tip and my qcheck seems to
err out.
https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/7Q53TMqxMQ/
Regards,
Keerthy
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
