On 03.04.19 13:11, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote:
On 03.04.2019 14:03, Eugen Hristev wrote:
On 02.04.2019 11:57, Stefan Roese wrote:
This patch adds the CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE option to select the SPL image that
shall be used to generate the combined SPL + U-Boot image. The default
value is the current value "spl/u-boot-spl.bin".
This patch also sets CONFIG_SPL_IMAGE to "spl/boot.bin" for AT91 targets
which use SPL NAND support (boot from NAND). For these build targets the
combined image "u-boot-with-spl.bin" is now automatically generated and
can be programmed into NAND as one single image (vs. SPL image and U-Boot
as 2 separate images).
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
Cc: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de>
Cc: Andreas Bießmann <andr...@biessmann.org>
Cc: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hris...@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de>
Tested on the taurus board:
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de>
---
v3:
- No change
v2:
- No change
Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
Makefile | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Kconfig b/Kconfig
index 305b265ed7..7c2b86f1f3 100644
--- a/Kconfig
+++ b/Kconfig
@@ -224,6 +224,15 @@ config BUILD_ROM
which are not shipped in the U-Boot source tree.
Please, see doc/README.x86 for details.
+config SPL_IMAGE
+ string "SPL image filename that is generated"
+ default "spl/boot.bin" if ARCH_AT91 && SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
+ default "spl/u-boot-spl.bin"
+ help
+ The SPL image filename that is generated by the build process.
+ This image might be used to generated a combined image with
+ SPL and main U-Boot proper as well.
+
Hi Stefan,
If I try to just use menuconfig and change this value to something else,
build fails. The purpose of this Kconfig is to name the SPL filename as
per the config's desire ?
Or in fact is "which binary file to use to make the Combined SPL+U-BOOT
mega image" ?
Ok, the commit message explains it pretty well, but the Kconfig help is
totally different... hence the confusion sorry.
So we need to either make a choice submenu in this Kconfig : either this
or that; or, do exactly what the Kconfig says: rename the output binary
into the value of this Kconfig.
Does this make sense ?
You are suggesting to add this SPL_IMAGE as choice instead of its
current implementation? That might be better, yes. Let me look into
this...
Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
