On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 9:26 PM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 12:48:58PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 7:01 AM Lukasz Majewski <lu...@denx.de> wrote: > > > > > Fabio, Stefano what do you think? > > > > > > As we change the clock.c code, IMHO we shall do the new port properly. > > > > I think the CCF solution proposed by Lukasz looks good and it will be > > easier to maintain and sync with the kernel. > > This sounds like an important goal as well, to me. Thanks!
I don't know why we rely too-much on Linux to import the big stack code, since the requirement of U-Boot here is to handle the clocks as minimum(as required) as compared to what OS is looking for. Are we looking for handling clock tree management for a whole or looking as required (or as simple) is the main criteria to think about. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
