Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > Dear "Reinhard Meyer (-VC)", > > In message <4c0b85d8.4070...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: >> is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only >> my port shall return the number of controllers initialized? > > I don't understand what you mean by "only my port". Ben's comment that > board_eth_init() is supposed to retrurn the number of successfully > initialized controllers has been standard policy for a pretty long > time, and many boards do so. > > Eventually the boards you compared against are older ones, and have > not been maintained well, so they misbehave in this regard? > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk >
Hello Wolfgang, Is that documented somewhere? I see that the calling function in net.c does NOT care about any positive interger result. Will it care sometime in the future? :) The second problem is that I cannot seem to undo my previous commit in my tree, so any changes I do to my source would come out as a second patch. Would that be accepted? Or do you know what must be done that GIT will issue a new patch with the current and the new changes in one patch? I generate the patches by <after editing>: git commit -m <message> git format-patch origin what to do to return to <after editing>, do new edits and generate a new, single patch? Best Regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot