With GCC 9.2.1 net/nfs.c leads to multiple errors of type
address-of-packed-member.
net/nfs.c: In function ‘rpc_req’:
net/nfs.c:199:18: error: taking address of packed member of
‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value
[-Werror=address-of-packed-member]
199 | p = (uint32_t *)&(rpc_pkt.u.call.data);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/nfs.c: In function ‘nfs_readlink_reply’:
net/nfs.c:631:46: error: taking address of packed member of
‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value
[-Werror=address-of-packed-member]
631 | nfs3_get_attributes_offset(rpc_pkt.u.reply.data);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
LD drivers/block/built-in.o
net/nfs.c: In function ‘nfs_read_reply’:
net/nfs.c:692:46: error: taking address of packed member of
‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value
[-Werror=address-of-packed-member]
692 | nfs3_get_attributes_offset(rpc_pkt.u.reply.data);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
struct rpc_t is only used as local variable. It is naturally packed. So
there is no need for the attribute packed.
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
---
net/nfs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/nfs.h b/net/nfs.h
index a377c90088..68ada0efeb 100644
--- a/net/nfs.h
+++ b/net/nfs.h
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct rpc_t {
NFS_MAX_ATTRS];
} reply;
} u;
-} __attribute__((packed));
+};
void nfs_start(void); /* Begin NFS */
--
2.23.0.rc1
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
