On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 5:05 PM Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote: > > With GCC 9.2.1 net/nfs.c leads to multiple errors of type > address-of-packed-member. > > net/nfs.c: In function ‘rpc_req’: > net/nfs.c:199:18: error: taking address of packed member of > ‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value > [-Werror=address-of-packed-member] > 199 | p = (uint32_t *)&(rpc_pkt.u.call.data); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > net/nfs.c: In function ‘nfs_readlink_reply’: > net/nfs.c:631:46: error: taking address of packed member of > ‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value > [-Werror=address-of-packed-member] > 631 | nfs3_get_attributes_offset(rpc_pkt.u.reply.data); > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ > LD drivers/block/built-in.o > net/nfs.c: In function ‘nfs_read_reply’: > net/nfs.c:692:46: error: taking address of packed member of > ‘struct rpc_t’ may result in an unaligned pointer value > [-Werror=address-of-packed-member] > 692 | nfs3_get_attributes_offset(rpc_pkt.u.reply.data); > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ > > struct rpc_t is only used as local variable. It is naturally packed. So > there is no need for the attribute packed. > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot