On 12/25/19 7:21 AM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
hi Heinrich,
Thanks for the review.

On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 at 22:35, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de
<mailto:xypron.g...@gmx.de>> wrote:

    On 12/24/19 4:54 PM, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
     > Add support for the EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL routines for the qemu arm64
     > platform. EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL is an uefi boottime service which is
     > invoked by the efi stub in the kernel for getting random seed for
     > kaslr.
     >
     > The routines are platform specific, and use the virtio-rng device on
     > the platform to get random data.
     >
     > The feature can be enabled through the following config
     > CONFIG_EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL
     >
     > Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu <sughosh.g...@linaro.org
    <mailto:sughosh.g...@linaro.org>>
     > ---
     >   board/emulation/qemu-arm/qemu-arm.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
     >   include/efi_rng.h                   | 34 +++++++++++++++++
     >   lib/efi_loader/Kconfig              |  8 ++++
     >   lib/efi_loader/Makefile             |  1 +
     >   lib/efi_loader/efi_rng.c            | 74
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
     >   5 files changed, 167 insertions(+)
     >   create mode 100644 include/efi_rng.h
     >   create mode 100644 lib/efi_loader/efi_rng.c
     >
     > diff --git a/board/emulation/qemu-arm/qemu-arm.c
    b/board/emulation/qemu-arm/qemu-arm.c
     > index e1f4709..3176421 100644
     > --- a/board/emulation/qemu-arm/qemu-arm.c
     > +++ b/board/emulation/qemu-arm/qemu-arm.c
     > @@ -91,3 +91,53 @@ void *board_fdt_blob_setup(void)
     >       /* QEMU loads a generated DTB for us at the start of RAM. */
     >       return (void *)CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_BASE;
     >   }
     > +
     > +#if defined(CONFIG_EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL)
     > +#include <efi_loader.h>
     > +#include <efi_rng.h>
     > +
     > +#include <dm/device-internal.h>
     > +
     > +#define VIRTIO_RNG_PCI_DEVICE        "virtio-pci.l#0"
     > +
     > +void platform_rng_getinfo(efi_rng_algorithm *rng_algo)

    Thanks for working on the implementation of the EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL.

    Please, put an underscore after each word: platform_rng_get_info


Ok.


     > +{
     > +     const efi_guid_t rng_raw_guid = EFI_RNG_ALGORITHM_RAW;
     > +
     > +     guidcpy(rng_algo, &rng_raw_guid);

    This function should be in efi_rng.c if it is needed at all.


Is the rng algorithm supported not platform specific. I believe
different platforms might use different algorithms for providing the
random seed.

Sure you may later want develop code implementing one of the other RNG
algorithms and than use a Kconfig setting to enable building the code
and calling it from the EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL driver. But this code will not
depend on whether you are using a specific board. A good place to put
the algorithms would be in lib/.

Have a look at EDK II's
SecurityPkg/RandomNumberGenerator/RngDxe/RdRand.c. That code does not
depend on anything from https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-platforms -
EDK II's analogue of our board/ and arch/ directories.

As platform_rng_getinfo() will only depend on Kconfig settings you can
put it into lib/efi_loader/efi_rng.c.

Best regards

Heinrich



     > +}
     > +
     > +efi_status_t platform_get_rng_device(struct udevice **dev)
     > +{

    Here you are creating platform specific code. The idea of the driver
    model in U-Boot is to separate duties.

    So the implementation of the EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL should be platform
    agnostic and rely simply on looping of the devices of UCLASS_RNG.


The core implementation of efi_rng_protocol routines is indeed platform
agnostic. I have just separated the method of getting the rng
device(struct udevice), since different platforms might need different
ways of getting the rng device. For example, on the qemu arm64 platform,
the rng device is a child of a virtio device on the pci bus, while the
rng module on the stm32mp1 platform is a direct memory mapped
peripheral. So the mechanism used to fetch the rng udevice would be
platform dependent. Hence the platform_get_rng_device function. In fact,
I see this kind of method adopted in a lot many other boards, one
example being board/CZ.NIC/turris_omnia/turris_omnia.c(get_atsha204a_dev).


    Please, move function platform_get_rng_device into the RNG uclass.


     > +     int ret;
     > +     efi_status_t status = EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
     > +     struct udevice *bus, *devp;
     > +
     > +     for (uclass_first_device(UCLASS_VIRTIO, &bus); bus;
     > +          uclass_next_device(&bus)) {
     > +             for (device_find_first_child(bus, &devp); devp;
    device_find_next_child(&devp)) {
     > +                     if (device_get_uclass_id(devp) == UCLASS_RNG) {
     > +                             *dev = devp;
     > +                             status = EFI_SUCCESS;
     > +                             break;
     > +                     }
     > +             }
     > +     }
     > +
     > +     if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
     > +             debug("No rng device found\n");
     > +             return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
     > +     }
     > +
     > +     if (*dev) {
     > +             ret = device_probe(*dev);
     > +             if (ret)
     > +                     return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
     > +     } else {
     > +             debug("Couldn't get child device\n");
     > +             return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
     > +     }
     > +
     > +     return EFI_SUCCESS;
     > +}
     > +#endif /* CONFIG_EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL */
     > diff --git a/include/efi_rng.h b/include/efi_rng.h
     > new file mode 100644
     > index 0000000..df749dd
     > --- /dev/null
     > +++ b/include/efi_rng.h
     > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
     > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
     > +/*
     > + * Copyright (c) 2019, Linaro Limited
     > + */
     > +
     > +#if !defined _EFI_RNG_H_
     > +#define _EFI_RNG_H_
     > +
     > +#include <efi.h>
     > +#include <efi_api.h>
     > +
     > +#define EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL_GUID \
     > +     EFI_GUID(0x3152bca5, 0xeade, 0x433d, 0x86, 0x2e, \
     > +              0xc0, 0x1c, 0xdc, 0x29, 0x1f, 0x44)
     > +
     > +#define EFI_RNG_ALGORITHM_RAW \
     > +     EFI_GUID(0xe43176d7, 0xb6e8, 0x4827, 0xb7, 0x84, \
     > +              0x7f, 0xfd, 0xc4, 0xb6, 0x85, 0x61)

    Please, add a comment line for each of the GUIDs.


Ok. Will do.


     > +
     > +typedef efi_guid_t efi_rng_algorithm;

    We want to avoid typedefs in U-Boot.


Ok. Will replace efi_rng_algorithm with efi_guid_t


     > +
     > +struct efi_rng_protocol {
     > +     efi_status_t (EFIAPI *getinfo)(struct efi_rng_protocol *this,

    get_info


Ok.


     > +                                    efi_uintn_t *rng_algo_size,

    Please, use the parameter names from the UEFI 2.8 specification:

    rng_algorithm_list_size

     > +                                    efi_rng_algorithm *rng_algo);

    rng_algorithm_list

     > +     efi_status_t (EFIAPI *getrng)(struct efi_rng_protocol *this,

    get_rng

     > +                                   efi_rng_algorithm *rng_algo,

    efi_guid_t *rng_algorithm

     > +                                   efi_uintn_t rng_len, uint8_t
    *rng_data);

    rng_value_length, rng_value


Ok. Will make the above suggested changes.

     > +};
     > +
     > +void platform_rng_getinfo(efi_rng_algorithm *rng_algo);
     > +efi_status_t platform_get_rng_device(struct udevice **dev);
     > +
     > +#endif /* _EFI_RNG_H_ */
     > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
     > index 21ef440..7437442 100644
     > --- a/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
     > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Kconfig
     > @@ -120,4 +120,12 @@ config EFI_GRUB_ARM32_WORKAROUND
     >         GRUB prior to version 2.04 requires U-Boot to disable
    caches. This
     >         workaround currently is also needed on systems with
    caches that
     >         cannot be managed via CP15.
     > +
     > +config EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL
     > +     bool "EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL support"
     > +     depends on DM_RNG && TARGET_QEMU_ARM_64BIT

    DM_RNG should be enough.

    Just return EFI_UNSUPPORTED from EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL if no device of the
    RNG uclass is found.


Ok.


     > +     help
     > +       "Support for EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL implementation. Uses the rng
     > +        device on the platform"
     > +
     >   endif
     > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
     > index 7db4060..04dc864 100644
     > --- a/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
     > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/Makefile
     > @@ -42,3 +42,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += efi_disk.o
     >   obj-$(CONFIG_NET) += efi_net.o
     >   obj-$(CONFIG_GENERATE_ACPI_TABLE) += efi_acpi.o
     >   obj-$(CONFIG_GENERATE_SMBIOS_TABLE) += efi_smbios.o
     > +obj-$(CONFIG_EFI_RNG_PROTOCOL) += efi_rng.o
     > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_rng.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_rng.c
     > new file mode 100644
     > index 0000000..8456592
     > --- /dev/null
     > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_rng.c
     > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
     > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
     > +/*
     > + * Copyright (c) 2019, Linaro Limited
     > + */
     > +
     > +#include <common.h>
     > +#include <dm.h>
     > +#include <efi_loader.h>
     > +#include <efi_rng.h>
     > +#include <rng.h>
     > +
     > +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;


    Please, add platform_rng_get_info() in this file.


Like I had mentioned above, could there not be a case where different
platforms might implement different algorithms for providing the random
seed. The uefi spec gives a list of few of the algorithms that might be
used.


     > +
     > +static efi_status_t EFIAPI rng_getinfo(struct efi_rng_protocol
    *this,
     > +                                         efi_uintn_t *rng_algo_size,
     > +                                         efi_rng_algorithm
    *rng_algo)
     > +{

    Please, call EFI_ENTRY here.


Ok. Will do.


     > +     if (!this || !rng_algo_size || !rng_algo)

    Please, allow RNGAlgorithmList == NULL here. The caller will typically
    call this function twice. The first call will inform the caller about
    the size of the buffer needed. The caller then allocates the buffer and
    calls the function again.


Ok. Will change. In fact, in case rng_algo is NULL, the rng_algo_size
can be set to reflect the size of the buffer needed, and the call then
return with EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL. I guess that is what the spec requires.


     > +             return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
     > +
     > +     if (*rng_algo_size < sizeof(*rng_algo)) {
     > +             *rng_algo_size = sizeof(*rng_algo);
     > +             return EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL;
     > +     }
     > +
     > +     *rng_algo_size = sizeof(*rng_algo);
     > +     platform_rng_getinfo(rng_algo);

    Having a platform_rng_get_info() function does not make much sense if we
    hard code the the size of the algorithm list above and the allowed
    algorithm below. So you can directly put your memcpy() here.


Ok. I think I now understand as to why were you asking me to move
platform_rng_get_info function into the efi_rng.c file.  Instead, i will
move the setting of the rng_algo_size to the platform code.


    If no UCLASS_RNG device is found, please, return EFI_UNSUPPORTED.

    Please, call EFI_EXIT here.


Ok.


     > +
     > +     return EFI_SUCCESS;
     > +}
     > +
     > +static efi_status_t EFIAPI getrng(struct efi_rng_protocol *protocol,
     > +                                    efi_rng_algorithm *rng_algo,
     > +                                    efi_uintn_t rng_len, uint8_t
    *rng_data)
     > +{
     > +     int ret;
     > +     struct udevice *dev;
     > +     const efi_guid_t rng_raw_guid = EFI_RNG_ALGORITHM_RAW;
     > +
     > +     /*
     > +      * Booting into the linux kernel mangles
     > +      * x18, which holds the gd.
     > +      * When the efi stub in the kernel invokes
     > +      * the GetRng routine, gd needs to be
     > +      * restored back, without which bad things
     > +      * happen
     > +      */
     > +     efi_restore_gd();

    Please, use EFI_ENTRY() instead.


Ok. Will change.


     > +
     > +     if (!protocol || !rng_data || !rng_len)
     > +             return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
     > +
     > +     if (rng_algo) {
     > +             if (guidcmp(rng_algo, &rng_raw_guid))
     > +                     return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
     > +     }
     > +
     > +     ret = platform_get_rng_device(&dev);
     > +     if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
     > +             return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;

    I think this should be EFI_UNSUPPORTED.


Ok. Will change.


     > +
     > +     ret = dm_rng_read(dev, rng_data, rng_len);
     > +     if (ret < 0) {
     > +             debug("Rng device read failed\n");
     > +             return EFI_DEVICE_ERROR;
     > +     }
     > +

    You have to call EFI_EXIT(EFI_SUCCESS) here.


Ok. Will change.

-sughosh

Reply via email to