On 2020-01-20 05:25, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Joel,
On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
On 2020-01-19 01:41, Baruch Siach wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
On 2020-01-19 00:22, Baruch Siach wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19 2020, Joel Johnson wrote:
This set of patches applies on top of
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1200324/,
based on testing using the static configuration fallback updates
in a
related patch series.
Thank you very much.
I'm currently working on an updated series with some significant
changes. These include rename of sys_eeprom to tlv_eeprom; move of
TLV
parse code to board/solidrun/common/; and support for TLV read in
pre-relocation phase. I'll add your fixes where applicable.
I hope to post v2 in the coming week.
baruch
Sounds good, thanks! I'm also getting ready to shoot out a V2 of my
static
ClearFog Base support which based on prior review I've rebased on
your
run-time config series. If it works for you, I'll go ahead and still
send
that
out for review, modulo your further changes. Are you expecting the
TLV/EEPROM
change updates to be included in time for the current merge window?
I hope to have TLV EEPROM ready for v2020.04.
Hmm, I was hoping to have the static config for ClearFog Base merged
in the
current merge window, so just to be clear is that what you're
targeting by
v2020.04 as well?
Yes. Code merged in this merge windows will appear in the next release
which is v2020.04.
I have just posted the updated series with your fixes squashed in,
sometimes in a different form (like the non CMD_TLV_EEPROM build fix).
Sounds great, I'll get my static config series updated against your
updates runtime detection series, and after a few days post the update,
pending any other comments on the v2 series.
With my recent rebasing, I believe I made the changes compatible
between
static and runtime configuration, but it's less important what order
they're
applied in - i.e. I can rebase again back on master and retain the
alignment. Perhaps it would be possible to merge the static changes
and then
update the static config entries' help text with a subsequent merge of
your
runtime work?
I'm not sure what you mean hear.
baruch
Just that if your TLC update wasn't available for the current merge
window I may want to request merging my static changes first instead of
the other way around. Since you clarified your schedule and posted the
updated series, it no longer matters.
Joel
