On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:46:25 +0800
Su Yue <damenly...@gmx.com> wrote:
> > + while (*cur != '\0') {
> > +
> > + cur = skip_current_directories(cur);
> > + len = next_length(cur);
> > + if (len > BTRFS_NAME_LEN) {
>
> next_length() promises @len <= BTRFS_NAME_LEN, so the check is trivial.
Hmm. This is a bug in next_length. I meant for next_length to return
len > BTRFS_NAME_LEN in case of too long name. Thanks for noticing.
> > + ret = btrfs_readlink(root, ino, target);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + free(target);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + target[ret] = '\0';
>
> It was done in btrfs_readlink() already.
It is in old btrfs_readlink, but is it even after this patches? I don't
see it in the new implementation.
> > +
> > + ret = btrfs_lookup_path(root, ino, target, &next_root,
> > + &next_ino, &next_type,
> > + symlink_limit);
>
> Just notify gentlely this is a recursive call here. I don't know
> whether uboot cares about stack things. But, recursion makes coding simpler
> :).
It is limited by symlink_limit. Until somebody complains about stack
issues I would like to keep it simple.
