On Wed 22 Apr 2020 at 18:04, Marek Behun <marek.be...@nic.cz>
wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:46:25 +0800 Su Yue <damenly...@gmx.com>
wrote:
> + while (*cur != '\0') { + + cur =
> skip_current_directories(cur); + len =
> next_length(cur); + if (len > BTRFS_NAME_LEN) {
next_length() promises @len <= BTRFS_NAME_LEN, so the check is
trivial.
Okay.
Hmm. This is a bug in next_length. I meant for next_length to
return len > BTRFS_NAME_LEN in case of too long name. Thanks for
noticing.
> + ret = btrfs_readlink(root, ino, target); +
> if (ret < 0) { + free(target); +
> return ret; + } + target[ret] = '\0';
It was done in btrfs_readlink() already.
It is in old btrfs_readlink, but is it even after this patches?
I don't see it in the new implementation.
You are right. The thing changed in the 17th patch.
btrfs_readlink()
doesn't set the null byte now.
--
Su
> +
> + ret = btrfs_lookup_path(root, ino, target, &next_root,
> + &next_ino, &next_type,
> + symlink_limit);
Just notify gentlely this is a recursive call here. I don't know
whether uboot cares about stack things. But, recursion makes coding simpler :).
It is limited by symlink_limit. Until somebody complains about stack
issues I would like to keep it simple.
