> 
> This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems
> with no NAND:
> 
> NAND:  nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00,
> Chip ID: 0x00 0 MiB
> 
> instead of:
> 
> NAND:  0 MiB

Scott,

What do you think of this patch?



> 
> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <st...@sakoman.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index ed1c9c9..cbcf2b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -2653,9 +2653,11 @@ static struct nand_flash_dev
> *nand_get_flash_type(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>       }
> 
>       if (!type) {
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NAND_QUIET_TEST
>               printk(KERN_INFO "%s: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID:"
>                      " 0x%02x, Chip ID: 0x%02x\n", __func__,
>                      *maf_id, dev_id);
> +#endif
>               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>       }
> 
> --
> 1.7.0.4
> 

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to