Hello.

On 02-09-2010 19:33, Steve Sakoman wrote:

> This printk was added recently and results in ugly output on systems
> with no NAND:

> NAND:  nand_get_flash_type: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x00, Chip 
> ID: 0x00 0 MiB

> instead of:

> NAND:  0 MiB

> Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman<st...@sakoman.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c |    7 +++++--
>   1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index ed1c9c9..b2400dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -2653,8 +2653,11 @@ static struct nand_flash_dev 
> *nand_get_flash_type(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>       }
>
>       if (!type) {
> -             printk(KERN_INFO "%s: unknown NAND device: Manufacturer ID:"
> -                    " 0x%02x, Chip ID: 0x%02x\n", __func__,
> +             /* supress warning if there is no nand */
> +             if ((*maf_id != 0x00)&&  (*maf_id != 0xff)&&
> +                 (dev_id  != 0x00)&&  (dev_id  != 0xff))

    Parens around != are not necessary.

WBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to