The commit 9f45aeb93727 ("spl: fit: implement fdt_record_loadable") which
introduced fdt_record_loadable() state there spl_fit.c is not 64bit safe.
Based on my tests on Xilinx ZynqMP zcu102 platform there shouldn't be a
problem to record these addresses in 64bit format.
The patch adds support for systems which need to load images above 4GB.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com>
---
common/fdt_support.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c
index b8a8768a2147..5ae75df3c658 100644
--- a/common/fdt_support.c
+++ b/common/fdt_support.c
@@ -611,14 +611,9 @@ int fdt_record_loadable(void *blob, u32 index, const char
*name,
if (node < 0)
return node;
- /*
- * We record these as 32bit entities, possibly truncating addresses.
- * However, spl_fit.c is not 64bit safe either: i.e. we should not
- * have an issue here.
- */
- fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "load", load_addr);
+ fdt_setprop_u64(blob, node, "load", load_addr);
if (entry_point != -1)
- fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "entry", entry_point);
+ fdt_setprop_u64(blob, node, "entry", entry_point);
fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "size", size);
if (type)
fdt_setprop_string(blob, node, "type", type);
--
2.28.0
